Deluded England, Part Two

Greetings pop pickers, would you Adam and Eve it, but England, surprise surprise, have been installed as favourites to win the forthcoming Six Nations tournament? We are told that England rugby is in turmoil after the national team’s embarrassing early exit from the Rugby World Cup, held in her own backyard. Yet, for all the humiliation, it seems that the default setting of the English bookmakers each year is to insert England as pre-tournament favourites. How laughable and tedious. No wonder the other home unions are so motivated to take the big bearded public schoolboys of Blighty down a peg or two!

So what exactly constitutes England’s pre-Six Nations favourites’ tag? Is it England’s loftier position in the world rankings? No. Wales and Ireland are currently placed higher. Secondly, is it England’s stellar progress at the 2015 Rugby World Cup, played largely in England, while all the other five nations floundered? No. Quite the opposite. Only Italy, alongside John Bull, failed to reach the last eight, while Scotland and Wales were within one score and a few minutes of a semi-final place.

So England’s favourites’ tag isn’t due to superior performances in the World Cup, with home advantage, nor higher IRB rankings? Oh I know. It must be a better track record in recent Six Nations, mustn’t it? Oh no, England have not enjoyed a clean sweep since 2003, since when Ireland and Wales have accumulated four grand slams between them. Even France have helped themselves to deux grand chelems in the last dozen years. In fact, over the course of the last dozen years, England have won the Championship once only, Ireland three times, and France and Wales have been champions four times each.

What then prompts the bookmakers, English of course, to tailor their odds to instal England as favourites? Self-delusion is the only possible answer. Consider the following nonsense, quoted at the time of writing:



England 15-8 with Bet365 and Sporting Bet; 13-8 with 888Sport; 7-4 with BetFred, BetVictor, StanJames, BetFair, and Bwin; 8-5 with 10Bet; 2-1 elsewhere

Ireland 5-2 with Bet365, SkyBet, StanJames, Ladbrokes, William Hill, Betfair, and Bwin; 11-4 with BetVictor and Coral; 9-4 with BetFred and Totesport

*Wales ranging from 11-4 to 7-2 with all bookmakers

France ranging from 7-2 to 11-2 with all bookmakers

Scotland ranging from 10-1 to 20-1 with all bookmakers

Italy ranging from 250-1 to 750-1 with all bookmakers


*Of course Wales’s chances are severely handicapped by having to visit Twickenham where England enjoy home advantage. Now where have we heard that misguided analysis before?!


3 Responses to “Deluded England, Part Two”

  1. Andy Bartlett

    Perhaps because bookmakers are not so much *predicting* the result of the tournament, but are playing the betting market. They must hedge their bets, so to speak, by setting odds that do not expose themselves to too much risk. English bookmakers, working in the English market, are likely to take a great number of bets on England to win.

    But why shouldn’t England be favourites? They have home games against Wales and Ireland. During Stuart Lancaster’s tenure they have won more Six Nations games than any of the other nations (in ‘old money’ they would have shared the last three Championships). And none of the Six Nations sides have exactly lit up this World Cup. There’s an argument for any one of England, Ireland, or Wales being actual (as opposed to bookies’) favourites. Given this, and given the fact that English bookies’ odds reflect the Enlgish market (which itself reflects more than simple form), it is a bit odd to read this as evidence of ‘delusion’ etc. Indeed, the argument is that delusion is ‘the only possible answer’!

    I know you need to find something to write about, but please try to make your articles not so transparently empty.

  2. Gary Watton

    England just have to be installed as favourites in spite of
    1. not being the highest ranked team
    2. not being the most successful team over the last decade
    3. having a worse World Cup than four of their neighbours.
    Still, I am being “transparently empty” for highlighting betting odds which are predictably logic-defying.

    • Andy Bartlett

      By bookies, who set odds to ensure they make money in a betting market, not to predict the winner…


Leave a Reply to Andy Bartlett Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>